Stand-alone learning materials

Trading-plan and risk worksheets

Use these independent learning tools to write down a scenario, test your assumptions, and review the decision. The fictional figures are for practice, not recommendations.

General education only, not personalized financial, investment, or trading advice. Trading involves risk, including loss of capital. A stop or exit is an instruction, not a guaranteed price or maximum loss. No outcome is promised.

Loading this browser’s saved draft…

Avoid entering account numbers, passwords, or information you would not want saved in this browser. The sample worksheet figures below are fictional and not recommendations.

Worksheet 01

Trading plan

Build a conditional plan before drawing a conclusion. If you choose no trade, explain why; entry and exit fields may be marked N/A.

Name the instrument, product type, and whether this is observation, paper practice, or a live-market review.

Record the date and timezone, session, chart or decision timeframe, and any event or liquidity context you checked.

Separate what you directly observed from what you are assuming. Note the source and timestamp for any market information.

State the idea in one sentence, then write one plausible explanation that would point the other way.

Describe the trigger, order type or price condition, the time it remains valid, and what you will do if price gaps past it.

Write the planned profit-taking or time-based exit conditions and how you will review partial fills.

Describe what would show the thesis is wrong or no longer current. An exit instruction may fill at a different price or not fill.

List missing information, spread or liquidity changes, events, limits, or emotional/process cues that mean wait or stand aside.

Choose an educational planning status. No trade is a complete and valid choice.

Record what happened after the decision, whether assumptions held, any difference from the plan, and one process lesson. If no order was placed, say so.

Fictional worked example

Plan example: fictional SAMPLE-1

All names and figures are invented for education. They are not market data, a trade signal, or a promise of performance.

Instrument and scenario
Fictional SAMPLE-1 share-like classroom scenario; paper planning only.
Date, session, and timeframe
Invented one-hour exercise. There is no real quote, session, event check, or market source.
Observations and assumptions
Exercise input only: a fictional reference value of $50.00. Assumption: a hypothetical range may hold; no live liquidity or news was checked.
Thesis and alternative explanation
Thesis: for the exercise, a close above a fictional range could support a continuation scenario. Alternative: the move could fail and return below the range.
Planned entry
Paper trigger only: a close above the invented $50.00 level. Do not chase a gap; let the exercise expire after one session.
Planned exit
For the scenario only, review at the invented $53.75 level or at the end of the exercise. Neither an exit nor its price is assured.
Invalidation conditions
The fictional idea is invalid below $48.75. An actual stop may slip, partially fill, or fail to execute.
Pause or no-trade conditions
No trade if the example lacks verified data, if there is an event or wide spread, if an exit cannot be planned, or if the learner-defined risk limit is unclear.
Decision for this review
Paper example only; no live order or recommendation.
Post-decision review
No order was placed. The assumptions were not checked against a market. The process lesson is to verify context and sizing before drawing any conclusion.

Worksheet 02

Risk-management plan

Record the assumptions behind exposure and size, then consider costs and a worse-than-planned outcome. The example formula is only for a simplified share-like unit.

Use a rounded, optional reference amount. Record existing positions, open risk, concentration, and relevant correlation or portfolio limits.

Write the loss or exposure limits you chose for this exercise and how you set them. Do not use the sample figures as a recommendation.

Name the unit or contract multiplier and explain the product-specific valuation method. Options, futures, and leveraged products need their own payoff and margin analysis.

Record the planned entry, invalidation or intended exit price, and the distance between them. If there is no trade, write N/A and why.

List estimated commissions and fees plus any borrow, funding, spread, tax, or other relevant costs. Say how you estimated each amount.

Describe plausible slippage, gaps, partial fills, halts, thin liquidity, or inability to exit. State which assumptions are not guaranteed.

Estimate the planned-invalidation case and at least one worse case. Include quantity, multiplier, costs, and execution assumptions in each calculation.

Show how you derive quantity or contracts, the multiplier, gross or notional exposure, and the modeled loss. Explain any rounding or cap.

List limits or unknowns that make the appropriate choice no trade, paper practice, or waiting. Include how you will avoid increasing risk after a limit is reached.

Choose an educational planning status. No trade is a complete and valid choice.

Compare actual or observed execution with the assumptions, note any limit breach or unexpected cost, and record one process change. For no trade, review whether the stand-aside rule was followed.

Fictional worked example

Risk example: share-like arithmetic

All names and figures are invented for education. They are not market data, a trade signal, or a promise of performance.

Capital and exposure context
Fictional reference capital: $10,000; no actual account or portfolio is represented.
Your learner-defined limits
For arithmetic demonstration only, assume a learner-selected $100 limit (1% of the fictional reference). This is not a suggested limit.
Unit, contract, and sizing model
Simplified share-like unit with a 1:1 price multiplier. This arithmetic is not suitable for options, futures, or leveraged products without product-specific analysis.
Entry and invalidation values
Invented entry $50.00; planned invalidation $48.75; distance $1.25 per unit.
Costs and their basis
Assume $4.00 fixed round-trip costs and $0.05 per unit total adverse slippage. Both are invented estimates, not actual fees.
Execution uncertainty
The $0.05 slippage allowance may be too low. A gap, halt, partial fill, or unavailable exit can produce a worse price or loss.
Downside scenarios
At the planned invalidation: 73 × ($1.25 + $0.05) + $4 = $98.90. If exit is instead $47.75 after a gap: 73 × ($2.25 + $0.05) + $4 = $171.90, above the assumed $100 limit.
Planned size and exposure
Risk budget: $10,000 × 1% = $100. Quantity: floor(($100 − $4) ÷ ($1.25 + $0.05)) = 73 units. Gross exposure: 73 × $50 = $3,650. The model does not cap actual loss.
No-trade decision conditions
No trade today: all prices and assumptions are fictional and no current spread, liquidity, or event context was verified. The gap case also exceeds the assumed limit.
Decision for this review
No trade today; the figures only demonstrate the worksheet arithmetic.
Post-decision review
No order was placed and no result is claimed. The planned case reconciles to $98.90; the gap case reconciles to $171.90. Review actual costs and execution separately in any real educational analysis.

Check the fictional sizing example

This is arithmetic practice for the invented share-like scenario only. A real stop may not execute at its stated price, and a gap or unavailable exit can exceed the assumed limit. The calculation is not a position recommendation.

Assumed planning budget
$100.00
Rounded-down units
73
Planned gross exposure
$3,650.00
Modeled invalidation case
$98.90
Modeled gap case
$171.90

Budget formula: $10,000 × 1% = $100. Units: floor(($100 − $4) ÷ ($50 − $48.75 + $0.05)) = 73. Exposure: 73 × $50 = $3,650. Planned case: 73 × ($1.25 + $0.05) + $4 = $98.90. Gap case at $47.75: 73 × ($2.25 + $0.05) + $4 = $171.90. Costs and prices are invented solely for this example.

Do not use these examples as current market information or as a reason to enter a trade. Pausing, paper practice, and making no trade are all valid learning decisions.